Attorney Newshubb
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Attorney Newshubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Law News

House bill would push Supreme Court justices into senior status after 18-year terms

admin by admin
July 28, 2022
in Law News


  1. Home
  2. Daily News
  3. House bill would push Supreme Court justices…

U.S. Supreme Court

House bill would push Supreme Court justices into senior status after 18-year terms

By Debra Cassens Weiss

July 28, 2022, 3:00 pm CDT

Image from Shutterstock.

A U.S. House of Representatives bill introduced Tuesday would allow new U.S. Supreme Court justices to serve 18 years in active service before they are moved to senior status.

The bill is called the Supreme Court Tenure Establishment and Retirement Modernization Act of 2022, which is shortened to the Supreme Court TERM Act.

Law360, Fox News, Axios and the Hill have coverage.

Democratic U.S. Rep. Hank Johnson of Georgia introduced the bill in the House. The bill is intended to preserve judicial independence by ensuring that senior justices “remain fully compensated members of the federal judiciary for life, capable of exercising official duties on and off the bench for as long as they choose,” according to a press release by Johnson’s office.

Under the bill, presidents would appoint Supreme Court justices in the first and third years after presidential elections. Current justices would assume senior status in order of length of service as new justices receive their commissions. Newly appointed justices would serve 18-year terms before moving to senior status.

If the number of justices in active service falls below nine, the justice who most recently assumed senior status would fill in.

Democratic U.S. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island plans to introduce a companion bill in the U.S. Senate.

“Term limits need to be one part of the conversation about reforming the Supreme Court, which has been captured by big special interests,” Whitehouse told WPRI.





Source link

Tags: ABA JournalCareer & PracticeCareersCourt AdministrationFederal GovernmentGovernmentJudiciarylawlegal newsLegislation & LobbyingU.S. Supreme Court
Previous Post

The Job Market Is Really, Really Good For Recent Law School Grads

Next Post

Bench Report: Harvard & Yale Still Dominate as Biden Diversifies the Judiciary + The Political Questions Doctrine in Lower Courts

Next Post

Bench Report: Harvard & Yale Still Dominate as Biden Diversifies the Judiciary + The Political Questions Doctrine in Lower Courts

Recommended

Sunstein Welcomes Prominent Boston Patent Attorneys Shane Hunter and T.J. Clark

August 9, 2022

Reach new clients with chat tools for your law firm’s website

July 27, 2022

Don't miss it

Law News

Law firms experience downturn in profits in first half of 2022, new survey says

August 18, 2022
Attorneys Legal Law News

How to Resolve a Shareholder Dispute

August 18, 2022
Law News

The morning read for Thursday, Aug. 18

August 18, 2022
Attorney News

Biden Relies Less on Feeder Judges Than Trump Did: The Morning Minute

August 18, 2022
Law News

8 types of clients you must manage in your legal practice

August 18, 2022
Attorney News

Orgaimi Founder Paul Giedraitis | The Value of Client Intelligence

August 18, 2022

© 2022 Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

Newsletter Sign Up

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

© 2022 Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.