Attorney Newshubb
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Attorney Newshubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Attorneys Legal Law News

Crisis Pregnancy Centers vs. Google: Should Search Engines Fight Misinformation?

admin by admin
August 2, 2022
in Attorneys Legal Law News


If someone is pregnant but doesn’t want to be, they might take to the internet to look for abortion providers. It may also be jarring to discover that at least 11% of Google’s abortion-related searches lead to anti-abortion nonprofits.

In the United States, there are nearly 3,000 crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) that do not provide abortions. There are significantly fewer clinics that provide abortions, with less than 800 nationally.

U.S. lawmakers who are in favor of abortion rights are urging Google to take a stand against crisis pregnancy centers. By encouraging the tech giant to limit or label search results that could mislead abortion seekers, these lawmakers hope to dissuade pregnant people from accidentally attending these centers.

On the contrary, Republican attorneys general from across the country hope to deter Google from limiting these search results.

But what even is a crisis pregnancy center? Why are anti-abortion advocates so against the bias disclosure of these nonprofits? And why is this all so important?

What Is a Crisis Pregnancy Center?

Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs), also known as pregnancy resource centers and derisively referred to as “fake clinics,” are nonprofit organizations that aim to discourage pregnant people from receiving abortions. Most CPCs are associated with national religious organizations, whose beliefs and tenets inform their work.

The vast majority of these “clinics” do not employ medical professionals and are not HIPPA compliant. Yet CPCs often pose and advertise as abortion clinics to get patients through the door who they can speak to and counsel against getting an abortion.

Even though these organizations are not medical facilities, some offer limited medical services, such as free ultrasounds, pregnancy tests, and sexually transmitted disease testing and treatment.

Some of these centers even offer “abortion pill reversal” — an untested, unregulated procedure that The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists states is “not based on science and do not meet clinical standards.”

Many abortion rights advocates argue that these organizations exist solely to mislead and confuse abortion seekers, citing that CPCs often open near actual abortion clinics.

A Push For Disclosure

In a letter written by Sen. Mark Warner, D-Virginia, and Rep. Elissa Slotkin, D-Michigan, the politicians ask Alphabet Inc. CEO Sundar Pichai how Google plans to assure that search results won’t mislead their users.

The letter urges Google to consider making changes to its search engine that would either:

  • Provide a disclaimer stating that these CPCs do not provide abortions
  • Suppress results for CPCs when someone is searching for abortion resources

The letter cites a Center for Countering Digital Hate study that found that 28% of advertisements displayed above Google searches regarding abortion are from CPCs. Additionally, 37% of Google Maps search results for abortion clinics resulted in anti-abortion facilities.

Anti-Abortion Advocates Take Action

Following the efforts of Warner and Slotkin, two Republican attorneys generals took action against their pleas.

Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares and Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron sent a letter of their own, signed by 15 additional GOP AGs, to Alphabet and Google. The letter defends the work of crisis pregnancy centers, citing that these nonprofits provide some of the health services mentioned above.

The letter then goes on to set the expectation that “at least some” of the individuals searching for abortion resources expect to find information from these non-medical centers.

Google hasn’t taken any action regarding CPCs, but the AGs’ letter threatens to investigate whether Google violated any antitrust or religious discrimination laws if CPCs are labeled or suppressed by Google.

The Future of Google and Crisis Pregnancy Centers

There has been little resolution to this brewing conflict. As of this writing, Google has yet to respond. It’s also unknown whether the GOP AGs plan to fulfill their promise of legal action. Furthermore, it’s completely unclear whether the investigations would even garner results!

Regardless, you can find crisis pregnancy centers through various maps that show their names, locations, and services they provide. You can check online reviews to verify whether the clinic in question is a crisis pregnancy center or a genuine abortion clinic. Abortion-rights activists and those who felt misled into going to crisis pregnancy centers are alerting the public through negative online reviews.

Finally, checking the website of a facility can provide answers as to whether the location provides the services you may be looking for. Abortion clinics will note that they provide abortion care or pregnancy termination on their websites.

Related Resources:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.





Source link

Tags: Crisis Pregnancy Centers vs. Google: Should Search Engines Fight Misinformation?
Previous Post

Paragon Attorney Spotlight: Carolyn Samiere

Next Post

Dentons advise Ganfeng on joint venture and offtake with Leo Lithium and US$170 million investment into Goulamina Lithium Project in Mali

Next Post

Dentons advise Ganfeng on joint venture and offtake with Leo Lithium and US$170 million investment into Goulamina Lithium Project in Mali

Recommended

Grubhub Delivery Drivers Are Not Exempt From Arbitration, Massachusetts High Court Says

August 4, 2022

Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: Bankruptcy Judge Brings in Ken Feinberg to Estimate Talc Claims. A Fight Erupts Over the 3M Earplug Bankruptcy’s Automatic Stay

August 3, 2022

Don't miss it

Attorneys Legal Law News

Are Online Casinos Legal in India?

August 9, 2022
Law News

Morning Docket: 08.09.22 – Above the LawAbove the Law

August 9, 2022
Attorney News

SEO for TikTok | 6 Steps for Lawyers to Stay on Top of Search

August 9, 2022
Attorney News

Manager of Key West Labor Staffing Companies Sentenced for Tax Crimes and Immigration Fraud

August 9, 2022
Attorney News

Bradley Adds Associate Whitney Wester to Houston Office

August 9, 2022
Attorney News

McGlinchey Attorney Adina Pollan Receives Florida Legal Recognitions

August 9, 2022

© 2022 Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

Newsletter Sign Up

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

© 2022 Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.