Attorney Newshubb
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Attorney Newshubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Law News

Court declines to halt execution of Alabama man whose jury voted against death penalty

admin by admin
November 17, 2022
in Law News


CAPITAL CASE


By Angie Gou

on Nov 16, 2022
at 7:25 pm

In a brief order with no recorded dissents, the Supreme Court refused to block the execution of Kenneth Eugene Smith, a 57-year-old inmate who is scheduled to die by lethal injection at 7 p.m. EST on Thursday in Alabama. Smith was convicted for the 1988 murder of Elizabeth Dorlene Sennett, whom he was hired to kill by her husband, Rev. Charles Sennett.

By a vote of 11 to 1, the jury in Smith’s 1996 capital trial recommended that he be sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. The trial judge overrode that decision, however, and sentenced him to death. Alabama was the last state in the United States to permit judicial override in capital cases. It outlawed the practice in 2017, but not retroactively. Smith argued that his execution, greenlit by a practice that is no longer permitted anywhere in the country, would violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments.

Dismissing Smith’s appeal as “extraordinary gamesmanship” to delay death, Alabama urged the justices to allow the execution to move forward. Smith’s “straight-to-the-top collateral attack on his sentence” violates state procedural rules, the state argued, and the Alabama Supreme Court properly denied his claim. Moreover, Alabama contended that the prohibition of judicial override was not evidence of a societal shift in values, as Smith argued, but rather an effect of judicial decisions rendered in the past two decades.

Smith replied that his petition was procedurally proper, as only the Alabama Supreme Court is allowed to set execution dates. Emphasizing that the abolition of judicial override in the United States reflects changes in national values, Smith reiterated his belief that the execution would constitute cruel and unusual punishment.

Smith was the third person facing imminent execution whose request for emergency relief was rejected by the Supreme Court on Wednesday. Earlier in the day, the justices turned down final appeals from Stephen Barbee and Murray Hooper.



Source link

Previous Post

Helpful Questions To Ask Of Clients When Working In-House

Next Post

Will Jaywalking Reforms Make You Safer?

Next Post

Will Jaywalking Reforms Make You Safer?

Recommended

The morning read for Friday, Feb. 17

February 17, 2023

The morning read for Tuesday, Dec. 20

December 20, 2022

Don't miss it

Law News

Can court ban abortion pill? Federal judge considers authority, plaintiffs’ standing

March 31, 2023
Law News

Selective-prosecution argument in Trump falsified-records case is ‘long shot’ that may still resonate

March 31, 2023
Attorney News

Office Keyboard Shortcuts | Office 365 Tech Tips for Lawyers

March 31, 2023
Attorney News

State Appellate Court Calls for New Trial: Omitting ‘If/Then’ Language From Proposed Med-Mal Jury Instruction Was Prejudicial

March 31, 2023
Attorney News

Corey Martens | Forensic Accountant Expert Witness

March 31, 2023
Attorneys Legal Law News

Getting Compensation for Pothole Damage to Your Car

March 31, 2023

© Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

Newsletter Sign Up

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

© 2022 Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.