Attorney Newshubb
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Attorney Newshubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Law News

The Mishandling Of Classified Documents

admin by admin
January 23, 2023
in Law News


(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Here’s today’s question: Could it harm national security for a high-ranking government official to cart around top-secret documents for a few years, stuff those documents into a cardboard box, and then pack that box in his garage or in a storage room in his country club?

I guess I have a follow-up question: If that could hurt national security, then shouldn’t the CIA (or the Department of Defense, or whoever) know that the top-secret documents are missing?

If misuse of highly classified documents could harm national security, then we should be outraged: We should promptly investigate (1) why high-ranking officials are able to walk off with classified documents in the first place and (2) why the relevant agency, presumably keeping close tabs on its classified information, had no clue that the documents were missing for years.

This strikes me as a Code 3 situation: Sirens should be sounding and lights flashing! The list with the names of all of our spies in Iran has been missing for several years! Anyone care to look around for it?

Doesn’t this wreak of a systemic failure in both the White House and a government agency? Shouldn’t a responsible person investigate? Why is no one demanding an investigation — of both the White House and the agencies — and why is everyone simply blaming the political party they don’t like?

This seems wrong.

Say, I have an idea!

Back in fourth grade, our librarian — I think it was Miss Fitzgerald — was pretty good at tracking overdue books. She’d charge you a nickel a day for any book kept out past its due date.

Let’s drag Miss Fitzgerald out of retirement and ask her to keep track of classified government documents. It’s a nickel a day for every day that the documents are past due.

My proposal has two benefits: First, Miss Fitzgerald would plainly do a better job than the CIA at tracking overdue documents. Miss Fitzgerald knew almost all the time when a book was past due, and she’d come after you pretty hard. (And this was in the days before computers. Just think what she could do today!) Second, my proposal would go a fair way toward solving the current problem with the debt limit. At a nickel a day, those overdue charges rack up: It’s something like $18 per year! Trump has lots of documents, and Biden has held his documents for more than six years now. And we know that lots of people besides the president walk away with classified documents. CIA Director David Petraeus and national security aide Sandy Berger both pleaded guilty to taking classified documents.

Nobody really seems to care about the substance of these documents; we’d have been better off with a nickel a day.

Not only that: If Trump, and Biden, and Petraeus, and Berger are walking around with classified documents, think how many other people must have boxes filled with these documents lying around in their basements. We could pay some teenager minimum wage to root around through the basements of people with security clearance and net a fortune on the investment!

I suspect I know why nobody really cares about the substance of these documents: The government surely stamps virtually every document as “super secret; eyes only,” because that’s the natural thing to do. In government-speak, that’s the “overclassification” of documents. But you and I have seen the process in action when low-level lawyers are tasked with marking corporate documents produced in litigation as “confidential” and thus “for use only in litigation.”

The young associate sees some document. It’s the take-out menu for Woolfie’s Delicatessen. There are a couple of handwritten words scribbled near the bottom of the menu. The associate can’t quite make out the words. “The words might be important, and I’ll get killed if some important document is made public. I guess I’ll stamp the menu ‘confidential’; we’ll withdraw the designation if the other side challenges it and somebody can read the writing.”

Next document.

So, too, I assume, in the government. The take-out menu for Woolfie’s is lying around somewhere in the CIA. It has a few words scribbled at the bottom. They appear to say, “2 roast beef with mustard,” but you can’t be absolutely sure. The document gets stamped “top secret.”

The document might contain information important to national security. If it does, there’d be hell to pay if it wasn’t marked “top secret.” And there’s basically no punishment for improperly classifying a document. In all likelihood, no one will ever notice the error. If they do, they’ll tell you that the document shouldn’t be deemed classified, and it’ll get changed. No harm; no foul.

One way to resolve the issues with Biden and Trump would simply be to declassify every document in dispute. After all, the documents have been lying around for years, and no one cared about the documents or missed them. So declassify ’em.  After all this time, let’s see what a tuna on whole wheat (with tomatoes) cost at that deli on 17th Street back in 2015.

What if I’ve inadvertently disclosed the nuclear codes? Biden didn’t care; Trump didn’t care; why should I care any more than our presidents do?

Besides, disclosure would go a long way toward solving the question of who, if anyone, should be prosecuted for the improper handling of classified material. I, at least, wouldn’t send Trump to jail for having the Woolfie’s menu at Mar-a-Lago; maybe Woolfie’s has a branch in Palm Beach.

But more than anything else, we should do this: A nickel a day for each day the documents are overdue.




Source link

Tags: Above the Lawabovethelaw.comassociate salariesbiglawblawgclerkshipsGovernmentIn-House Counseljudgeslaw clerkslaw firm newslaw firm rankingslaw firm salarieslaw schoolslawyer bloglegal bloglegal gossiplegal newslegal scandallegal tabloidMarr Herrmannpartner salariesPoliticsprofits per partner list
Previous Post

Meet Fani Willis, the Georgia prosecutor investigating Trump and his allies

Next Post

The morning read for Monday, Jan. 23

Next Post

The morning read for Monday, Jan. 23

Recommended

10th Circ. Grants Class Certification in Challenge to School District’s Refusal to Create All-Girls Football Team

January 8, 2023

DOJ Names Former Corruption Prosecutor Jack Smith As New Chief Villain In Right-Wing Fever Dreams

November 19, 2022

Don't miss it

Law News

Which law school got two No. 1 rankings by Princeton Review?

February 5, 2023
Law News

Disbarred lawyer and estranged husband of ‘Real Housewives’ star is charged with stealing $18M; is he competent for trial?

February 5, 2023
Attorney News

Business Owner Agrees to $125K Settlement for Purported Legal Threats Over Negative Customer Reviews

February 5, 2023
Attorney News

Kerry Inc. Pleads Guilty and Agrees to Pay $19.228 Million in Connection with Insanitary Plant Conditions Linked to 2018 Salmonella Poisoning Outbreak

February 5, 2023
Attorneys Legal Law News

School Suspension and Student Rights

February 5, 2023
Law News

Court declines to block execution of Texas man who argued that jurors engaged in anti-Hispanic bias

February 5, 2023

© 2022 Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

Newsletter Sign Up

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

© 2022 Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.