Attorney Newshubb
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Attorney Newshubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Law News

A Second Bite At The Apple: Does Section 230 Protect Content Providers That Aid Terrorists?

admin by admin
February 22, 2023
in Law News


How much did they know?

Following yesterday’s lackluster attack on Section 230, today’s attempt to curb the law’s broad protections is much more pointed. As you likely know, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects large content hosts like Youtube and Twitch from facing legal liability when one of their users posts offensive or harmful content to the platform. Even the really harmful stuff. Youtube & Co. may have to actually do something about that depending on the outcome of this case.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday heard for a second straight day a bid to hold internet companies accountable for contentious content posted by users, this time involving a lawsuit against Twitter Inc by the American relatives of a Jordanian man killed in an Istanbul nightclub massacre.

The justices on Tuesday heard arguments in an appeal arising from a separate lawsuit against Google LLC-owned YouTube, part of Alphabet Inc (GOOGL.O), by the family of an American woman killed in a Paris attack by Islamist militants. Both lawsuits were brought under a U.S. law that enables Americans to recover damages related to “an act of international terrorism.”

Relatives of Nawras Alassaf accused Twitter of aiding and abetting the Islamic State group, which claimed responsibility for the Jan. 1, 2017, attack that killed him and 38 others shortly after midnight during a New Year’s celebration, by failing to police the platform for its accounts or posts.

The sensitive facts of this case may explain why, despite centering around Section 230, it appears to be an afterthought:

For the record: We are 2 hours into the “section 230” case and we just got our first actual mention of Section 230. 🙂

— Elie Mystal (@ElieNYC) February 22, 2023

A separate non-Section 230 but still very key matter to determine is the nature of Youtube’s assistance to Islamist militants. Sure, there’s no doubting that the content was on the site, but what’s the difference between abstractly knowing your platform may be used for terroristic ends and knowing your platform is being used for terroristic ends?

“How specific must the knowledge be? There must be a range between aiding the enterprise and knowing the time, date and location of the particular act, right?” Barrett asked.

A key issue is whether the family’s claims sufficiently allege that the company knowingly provided “substantial assistance” to an “act of international terrorism” that would allow the relatives to maintain their suit and seek damages under the anti-terrorism law.

President Joe Biden’s administration is backing Twitter in the case, saying the Anti-Terrorism Act imposes liability for assisting a terrorist act and not for “providing generalized aid to a foreign terrorist organization” with no causal link to the act at issue. The administration backed the plaintiffs in the case argued on Tuesday.

Knowledge can be a very high threshold to prove, legally speaking. Proving that Youtube C-suite had to know the time, place, temperature, and star placements that ISIS had in mind for their recruitment scheme would be a nearly impossible standard for future plaintiffs to meet, just as dropping the gavel because they should have known that something — eventually — might definitely could happen would turn the knowledge requirement into more of a let’s just see how the Justices feel about this specific instance sort of vibe. Wouldn’t put it past the YOLO court, but even the right wing justices are treading water lightly.

You can have a conversation about forcing sites to host more content (I’d disagree), but a lot of talk about Section 230 on the right is simply about tearing it down whatever way they can. Yet, you aren’t going to get more speech AND more liability. Looks like Thomas gets that. https://t.co/TB81Rhivj0

— Patrick Hedger (@PatHedger18) February 22, 2023

Earlier: SCOTUS Is Hearing Arguments Against Section 230. Everyone Else Is Hearing How Unprepared The Plaintiffs Are

U.S. Supreme Court Debates Case Against Twitter Over Istanbul Massacre [Reuters]


Chris Williams became a social media manager and assistant editor for Above the Law in June 2021. Prior to joining the staff, he moonlighted as a minor Memelord™ in the Facebook group Law School Memes for Edgy T14s.  He endured Missouri long enough to graduate from Washington University in St. Louis School of Law. He is a former boatbuilder who cannot swim, a published author on critical race theory, philosophy, and humor, and has a love for cycling that occasionally annoys his peers. You can reach him by email at cwilliams@abovethelaw.com and by tweet at @WritesForRent.





Source link

Tags: Above the Lawabovethelaw.comassociate salariesbiglawblawgclerkshipsCourtsISISjudgeslaw clerkslaw firm newslaw firm rankingslaw firm salarieslaw schoolslawyer bloglegal bloglegal gossiplegal newslegal scandallegal tabloidpartner salariesprofits per partner listSection 230Supreme CourtTechnologyYouTube
Previous Post

What attorneys need to consider financially about their retirement

Next Post

The morning read for Wednesday, Feb. 22

Next Post

The morning read for Wednesday, Feb. 22

Recommended

Will Jaywalking Reforms Make You Safer?

November 17, 2022

Would Twitter get Section 230 immunity in lawsuits filed over fake tweets with blue check marks?

November 18, 2022

Don't miss it

Law News

Former BigLaw attorney gets 1-year suspension for trading on information learned as conflicts counsel

March 23, 2023
Attorney News

Law Firm Website Design | Trends for 2023

March 23, 2023
Attorney News

Court Sides With US Patent and Trademark Office in Rejecting Bulk of Attorney’s FOIA Request

March 23, 2023
Attorney News

Passenger Injuries on Cruise Ships Out of South Florida

March 23, 2023
Law News

Justices appear sympathetic to Jack Daniel’s in trademark parody dispute

March 23, 2023
Law News

To Tell Or Not To Tell: That Is The Question

March 23, 2023

© 2022 Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

Newsletter Sign Up

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

© 2022 Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.