Attorney Newshubb
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Attorney Newshubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Law News

Lawyer accused of pursuing client-poaching ‘modus operandi’ hit with $2.3M verdict

admin by admin
March 2, 2023
in Law News



  1. Home
  2. Daily News
  3. Lawyer accused of pursuing client-poaching…

Trials & Litigation

Lawyer accused of pursuing client-poaching ‘modus operandi’ hit with $2.3M verdict

By Debra Cassens Weiss

March 1, 2023, 2:20 pm CST

The Florida Injury Law Firm based in Orlando, Florida, was awarded $2.3 million last week in a lawsuit against a former associate accused of violating an employment contract by stealing the firm’s best clients.

The jury found that lawyer Thomas P. Schmitt was liable for violating his employment agreement, report Law.com and Law360.

The Florida Injury Law Firm and its founder, Johnny A. Pineyro, were plaintiffs.

Schmitt indicated that he’s not done with the legal fight.

“This is just the beginning,” he told the ABA Journal in an email. “It’s not over until it’s over.”

Law.com posted the Feb. 21 jury verdict form, which was filed Feb. 22, and the law firm’s third amended suit filed against Schmitt.

The suit alleged that Schmitt has a “modus operandi of gaining employment at law firms with the undisclosed intent of stealing as many clients as possible.” He had been fired by two other firms, one of which sued him, and had been sued by a third firm, the complaint alleged.

When he left the Florida Injury Law Firm, Schmitt and an associate who assisted him cherry-picked the most lucrative cases to steal, the complaint alleged. One case, for example, settled for $1 million just one week after it was transferred to Schmitt.

The employment agreement said Schmitt could not contact clients of the firm at the end of his employment unless the client first contacted Schmitt. If Schmitt was working on a client file, the client would be notified by a joint letter with the firm.

In cases originated by the firm, the firm would be entitled to 80% of all fees generated in the matter. If Schmitt originated a client, he would owe 50% to 60% of the net fee to the firm, depending on the length of the representation.

Schmitt sent a letter, however, using a forged electronic signature for Pineyro, according to the suit. He succeeded in “luring away” more than 50 clients whose cases have a collective value of millions of dollars, the complaint said.

Jurors said damages were $2.3 million for the breached contract, and the quantum meruit value of the firm’s services to its former clients was nearly $980,000. The defendants are Schmitt and his new firm, the Florida Personal Injury Law Team. Pineyro can opt for either amount, but not both, according to Law.com.

Pineyro told Law.com that he wanted firms to know about the importance of performing background checks before hiring new lawyers. Schmitt had left important information off his resumé and had falsely claimed that he studied at Oxford University on a Rhodes scholarship, the suit alleged.

“Call the references because I, unfortunately, did not do that with him,” Pineyro told Law.com. “It was every lawyer’s nightmare.”





Source link

Tags: ABA JournalCareer & PracticeContract AttorneysContractsCorporate LawEmployeesEmployersFloridaJuriesLabor & EmploymentlawLaw Firmslegal newsPractice ManagementStatesTrials & LitigationVerdicts & Settlements
Previous Post

Dechert faces 3 UK trials, 2 US suits stemming from 1 former partner’s work

Next Post

Report: Class-action Securities Lawsuits Decline but Risks Remain for Life-sciences Companies

Next Post

Report: Class-action Securities Lawsuits Decline but Risks Remain for Life-sciences Companies

Recommended

Why Your Law Firm Isn’t Ranking On Google (And How To Fix It!)

November 20, 2022

9th Circuit blocks California’s ban on forced arbitration agreements in workplace disputes

February 21, 2023

Don't miss it

Attorney News

AI for Lawyers | Q&A With AI Marketing Institute CEO Paul Roetzer

March 20, 2023
Attorney News

Defendant’s ‘Repeated Confessions,’ Corroborative Evidence Leads Appellate Court to Reinstate Jury OVI Verdict

March 20, 2023
Attorney News

Hopkins & Carley Welcomes Mark Boennighausen and Dinah Ortiz

March 20, 2023
Law News

Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case

March 20, 2023
Law News

How SAMHSA Is Tackling the Mental Health Workforce Shortage

March 20, 2023
Attorney News

Bench Report: Judges Are Removing Their Private Info From the Web + Why This Judge Is Writing Pro Se Summaries

March 19, 2023

© 2022 Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

Newsletter Sign Up

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

© 2022 Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.