Attorney Newshubb
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Attorney Newshubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Law News

Mike Pence Testifies To Grand Jury As Trump Lawyers Dawdle

admin by admin
April 29, 2023
in Law News


(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

On Wednesday evening at 8:25, a three-judge panel from the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit rejected Donald Trump’s emergency petition to block Mike Pence testifying about the Capitol Riot. And on Thursday morning, bright and early, the former vice president showed up at the E. Barrett Prettyman federal courthouse to spend several hours in the company of the grand jury investigating the events leading up to January 6, 2021.

Let no one accuse Special Counsel Jack Smith of dragging his feet!

In February, the special counsel subpoenaed Pence, who resisted compliance under the Speech or Debate Clause. He argued that, in his role as president of the senate, he functioned as a sort of government chimera, enjoying both executive and legislative privileges. Trump also sought to stop the testimony on executive privilege grounds.

In a March 28 order by Chief Judge James Boasberg, who took over for Judge Beryl Howell as chief of the DC District Court, gave him a partial victory. Pence was ordered to testify about anything he did or saw as vice president, including any conversations with Trump which might have been criminal in nature. But he could refuse to testify about about what he did in his role as senate president.

Presumably means the parts where he was hiding in the basement from the mob sent by Trump as they rampaged the building screaming to “Hang Mike Pence” are off limits. Although Pence’s aides Marc Short and Greg Jacob have likely already told the jurors about that part, since the courts overruled their executive privilege claims and ordered them to spill the beans. And indeed Trump’s own claims of executive privilege have fared no better, getting uniformly side eyed by the federal judiciary throughout this process.

Just as Judge Beryl Howell did before when the president sought to prevent his aides Mark Meadows, Dan Scavino, and Johny McEntee from telling the grand jury what they saw, Judge Boasberg refused to countenance any of Trump’s privilege arguments regarding the vice president.

As is his wont, Trump’s lawyers took their time moseying over to the Circuit Court, waiting twelve days to file an appeal of Judge Boasberg’s order. And Judges Millet, Wilkins, and Katsas considered the matter for slightly longer than Judges Pillard, Pan, and Childs, who took less than 24 hours to dropkick Trump’s plea to block his lawyer Evan Corcoran testifying to the documents grand jury. But the result was much the same, with even Judge Katsas apparently concurring in the sealed per curiam opinion.

Perhaps if he’d been quicker out of the gate, there would have been time to file a request for stay with the Supreme Court. Or maybe Trump wouldn’t have bothered even if he’d had another week. In the event, his attorneys did not appeal the order before Pence’s motorcade pulled up at the courthouse, and now the issue is apparently moot.

Trump loses appeal to block Pence from testifying about direct communications [CNN]

In re Sealed Case [Appellate docket, via Court Listener]


Liz Dye lives in Baltimore where she writes about law and politics and appears on the Opening Arguments podcast.





Source link

Tags: Above the Lawabovethelaw.comassociate salariesbiglawblawgCapitol riotclerkshipsDonald TrumpGovernmentJack Smithjudgeslaw clerkslaw firm newslaw firm rankingslaw firm salarieslaw schoolslawyer bloglegal bloglegal gossiplegal newslegal scandallegal tabloidMike Pencepartner salariesprofits per partner list
Previous Post

ABA announces 2023 Margaret Brent Award recipients

Next Post

The standard for bringing a “whistleblower” retaliation claim under Sarbanes-Oxley

Next Post

The standard for bringing a “whistleblower” retaliation claim under Sarbanes-Oxley

Recommended

Early Information is Vital in School Bus Injury-Related Cases

September 10, 2023

Goodwin Procter plans layoffs of lawyers, paralegals and staff members

January 15, 2023

Don't miss it

Law News

4 ways to grow your new law firm without overextending yourself

September 27, 2023
Law News

‘I feel proud of myself that I stood up,’ law prof says after $750K bias settlement is approved

September 27, 2023
Attorney News

Fix the Grammar | Anything Wrong With These Sentences?

September 27, 2023
Attorney News

Federal Judge Finds Immigration Judges Have Standing to Challenge 2021 Policy

September 27, 2023
Attorney News

Barnes & Thornburg Adds Veteran Real Estate Duo John Ginley III and Marc Bulson

September 27, 2023
Law News

Court denies Alabama’s request to use voting map with only one majority-Black district

September 27, 2023

© Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

Newsletter Sign Up

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

© 2022 Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.