Attorney Newshubb
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Attorney Newshubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Law News

States seeking greater reach for their abortion laws may turn to Supreme Court’s pig-welfare decision

admin by admin
May 16, 2023
in Law News


  1. Home
  2. Daily News
  3. States seeking greater reach for their abortion…

Constitutional Law

States seeking greater reach for their abortion laws may turn to Supreme Court’s pig-welfare decision

By Debra Cassens Weiss

May 15, 2023, 2:35 pm CDT

Image from Shutterstock.

A U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding a pig-welfare law could be seized upon by states looking to expand the reach of their abortion regulations.

Politico reports on the possible impact of the May 11 Supreme Court decision, which upheld a California law that bans the in-state sale of pork that comes from pigs raised in tiny stalls. The court had found no violation of the dormant commerce clause, which generally bans state laws intended to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors.

Pork producers had argued the law violated the dormant commerce clause because it controlled commerce outside California and it imposed excessive burdens relative to the benefit.

The decision involves states’ ability to take actions with impacts beyond their borders, which “is also central to the legal imbroglio over abortion,” Politico says. “The decision could, for instance, embolden states to crack down on the mailing of abortion pills. States with strong prevailing views on abortion could even seek to restrict the sale of goods from states with contrary views.”

Justice Brett Kavanaugh identified another possibility in a dissent to the Supreme Court decision. A state could try to prevent the retail sale of items from companies based on whether they pay for employees’ birth control or abortions, he said.

University of California at Davis law professor Mary Ziegler noted the possibilities in an op-ed for the Boston Globe.

“One thing is clear after the Supreme Court’s decision in the California pork case,” Ziegler wrote. “As interstate conflicts around abortion escalate, abortion-rights supporters may have one less legal weapon in their arsenal.”

Ziegler notes one possible impediment to states trying to ban in-state importation of abortion pills, however. The medication is regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and federal laws could trump state laws.

“And if a conservative state like Missouri tries to make it a crime for someone in Illinois to perform an abortion for a Missouri resident, a court would most likely apply Illinois law, not Missouri rules,” Ziegler writes.





Source link

Tags: ABA JournalabortionConstitutional LawHealth LawHealthcare & Pharmaceuticslawlegal newsPublic InterestU.S. Supreme Court
Previous Post

Why lawyers in Young Slime Life trial got a free lunch from strip club

Next Post

Biglaw Partner Bracketing Clause And Writing ‘F*#k,’ Sufficient To Get Malpractice Claim To Trial

Next Post

Biglaw Partner Bracketing Clause And Writing 'F*#k,' Sufficient To Get Malpractice Claim To Trial

Recommended

Complex litigation judge has 50 ideas to simplify the courts

September 17, 2023

Eisenhower Boxes | Effortlessly Organize Your Life

March 6, 2023

Don't miss it

Law News

Leading criminal defense lawyer who represented Clinton in sex scandals dies at 84

September 29, 2023
Law News

‘Torture Memos’ author testifies in ethics hearing to support Eastman’s ideas on Pence as election arbiter

September 29, 2023
Attorney News

Flex Payments | The Benefits for Client-Focused Law Firms

September 29, 2023
Attorney News

Chipotle Hit With Discrimination Suit Over Conduct Toward Muslim Employee

September 29, 2023
Attorney News

Allison Ahern Fillo Receives 2023 “Top Women of Law” Honor

September 29, 2023
Law News

Consumer watchdog funding fight goes before justices

September 29, 2023

© Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

Newsletter Sign Up

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

© 2022 Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.