Attorney Newshubb
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Attorney Newshubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Attorney News

Sunstein Client Benchmark Technologies Scores Trade Secret Jury Verdict and Injunctive Relief

admin by admin
June 20, 2023
in Attorney News


BOSTON, MA—Sunstein LLP is pleased to announce that it has obtained a favorable judgment confirming the results of its jury verdict for Benchmark Technologies, Inc., a leading international supplier of test reticles, photomasks, and related services for lithography systems (including in the semiconductor industry), as well as of fabrication of grating-based products such as high precision gratings and phase masks, in a year-long trade secret defense matter argued at the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

In Benchmark Technologies, Inc. v. Yuqiang Tu and Kifonix Technology, LLC, Benchmark asserted that its former senior applications engineer, defendant Yuqiang (Richard) Tu, resigned to form a competing business and, among other misconduct, misappropriated five categories of trade secrets — valuable Benchmark intellectual property that gives the company a distinct competitive advantage in the market. Richard Tu and Lijun (Jenny) Luo are the managers of Kifonix.

Benchmark filed suit promptly after learning that Tu planned to use Benchmark’s trade secrets and confidential information, which he helped to develop while at Benchmark, to start his own business. Benchmark was able to quickly shut down the defendants’ illegal activity with a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.

The post Sunstein Client Benchmark Technologies Scores Trade Secret Jury Verdict and Injunctive Relief appeared first on Attorney at Law Magazine.



Source link

Previous Post

Court strikes a blow for sentencing discretion under provision in federal firearm statute

Next Post

‘Hot FERC Summer’?: Energy Lawyers Watching for Burst of Action From Overworked Agency

Next Post

'Hot FERC Summer'?: Energy Lawyers Watching for Burst of Action From Overworked Agency

Recommended

Christian school renews effort to expand religious freedom over employment

March 18, 2023

Once-suspended Twitter user argues California violated his First Amendment rights

August 26, 2023

Don't miss it

Law News

4 ways to grow your new law firm without overextending yourself

September 27, 2023
Law News

‘I feel proud of myself that I stood up,’ law prof says after $750K bias settlement is approved

September 27, 2023
Attorney News

Fix the Grammar | Anything Wrong With These Sentences?

September 27, 2023
Attorney News

Federal Judge Finds Immigration Judges Have Standing to Challenge 2021 Policy

September 27, 2023
Attorney News

Barnes & Thornburg Adds Veteran Real Estate Duo John Ginley III and Marc Bulson

September 27, 2023
Law News

Court denies Alabama’s request to use voting map with only one majority-Black district

September 27, 2023

© Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

Newsletter Sign Up

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney News
  • Law News
  • Attorneys Legal Law News
  • Contact us

© 2022 Attorneys News Hubb All rights reserved.